process.arts - Comments for "New content type " https://process.arts.ac.uk/content/new-content-type Comments for "New content type " en Working again https://process.arts.ac.uk/content/new-content-type#comment-1432 <p>The new content upload is working ok now, sorry for the inconvenience.</p> Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:08:00 +0000 cfollows comment 1432 at https://process.arts.ac.uk Problems with content uplaod https://process.arts.ac.uk/content/new-content-type#comment-1430 <p>The new content type functionality seems to have disappeared, our developer is looking into it, will let you know when fixed.</p> Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:36:10 +0000 cfollows comment 1430 at https://process.arts.ac.uk Thanks https://process.arts.ac.uk/content/new-content-type#comment-1428 <p>Thanks for this feedback really useful! I've always had problems with the old content upload but without a development budget for PA was hard to change, Grzesiek's had to do a lot of detective work to strip out the old and bring in the new with minimum disruption, a genius! Will make some tutorials once we have made a few changes and road tested a bit more.</p> <p>Cheers </p> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:39:45 +0000 cfollows comment 1428 at https://process.arts.ac.uk Listing images https://process.arts.ac.uk/content/new-content-type#comment-1426 <p>I prefer the new way of adding content. I must admit that I had given up a few times in the past because it shouldn't be hard work to add content and I thought that the previous version was.</p> <p>I like the way it is possible to 'bank' images from the outset and then 'insert' them into posts as you go without creating a slide show. The more 'bloggy' looking content enables readers to view images that refer to the text as they scroll down. It would be good to add a 'caption' the uploaded images if possible. I know that on scroll over the image title appears, but if refering to an images as say; fig.1 it would be good to have that imag ecaptioned. Obvioulsy it's possible to type the caption in, but it can get messy seperating captions from content in the published doc.</p> <p>If you want the text under the image, rather than beside it as tends to happen by default, you'll need to hit the return button a few times. This leaves massives gaps in the editor, but none in the published doc. I suppose it's an HTML thing! I'm going to try centering my images next to see if it will force the text under the image without needing to add the returns.</p> <p>My top tip is the &lt;br&gt; tag in the HTML editor or 'switch to plain text editor' this enables you to make a title without there being a new paragraph gap after it. It will take some searcing for but it's a nice touch.BTW you dont need to add a &lt;/br&gt; if this makes sense.</p> <p>I'm pretty sure that Chris will make some tutorials, but this is fairly instinctive interface so give it a go!</p> <p> </p> <p>Steve</p> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:16:36 +0000 swood comment 1426 at https://process.arts.ac.uk